International - IFEX Member Campaigns
Civil society groups express concern over the potential for overbroad anti-extremism practices to limit free expression
Civil society groups mark the anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attack by calling on governments worldwide to fulfill their obligation to protect freedom of expression.
On World Press Freedom Day, organisations from around the globe commit to defending the right to freedom of expression, even when that right is being used to express views that may be offensive.
Eight human rights organisations have developed an outline of qualifications that they believe are relevant to the selection and appointment of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy.
ARTICLE 19 and NGOs around the globe urge the Inter-Parliamentary Union to reject Jordan's proposed resolution, which could potentially legitimise the use of blasphemy laws by governments everywhere.
The members of the Coalition Against Unlawful Surveillance Exports (CAUSE) have addressed an open letter to the Wassenaar Arrangement's participating states ahead of their plenary meeting asking them to take heed of civil society views in their negotiations on dual-use goods and technologies.
More than 100 civil society organisations ask the UN Secretary General to recognise the importance of free expression rights in the sustainable development goals.
This week's discussion of the report on surveillance by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights at the Human Rights Council is a critical moment in the global understanding of the human rights challenges raised by unlawful and arbitrary surveillance.
IFEX members and partners from around the world urge the UN to include access to information in the Agenda for the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals.
Faced with the vulnerability of information providers in exile, and in taking into account the inadequacy of international protective mechanisms, Reporters Without Borders, the Committee to Protect Journalists and the Rory Peck Trust published a list of recommendations to the international community.
This week, a resolution on the importance of protecting human rights online was discussed at the 26th UN Human Rights Council Session in Geneva. Read the oral statement on this resolution led by ARTICLE 19 and supported by several IFEX members.
The undersigned organisations believe that a balanced and effective international copyright framework should support robust discussion of exceptions and limitations to copyright, as well as protections for creators.
Making a statement during International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO-T).
In response to a consultation being undertaken by the UN on the right to privacy in the digital age, Privacy International in conjunction with six other groups called on the UN to recognise that mass surveillance is incompatible with human rights.
195 civil society organisations from around the world have called on the UN to put government accountability and independent media at the centre of a new framework for global development.
Leading free speech and privacy organisations have called on the world's elite assembled at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland to tackle the challenge of global mass surveillance of electronic communications.
On 9 December 2013, a joint statement was launched with the intention of starting a discussion on including access to information as a central pillar in the post-2015 development framework.
The Open Government Partnership is an international platform for domestic reformers committed to making their governments more open, accountable, and responsive to citizens. A joint letter to the OGP highlights civil society's concerns about state surveillance practices.
The UN General Assembly should approve a new resolution and make clear that indiscriminate surveillance is never consistent with the right to privacy, five human rights organisations said in an open letter.
. . .
During an event at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, a coalition of civil society organisations launched a set of standards that interpret States' human rights obligations in light of new technologies and surveillance capabilities.