14 January 2008

Alert

"Clarifications" on criminal defamation law by Supreme Court leave journalists at risk


(Globe International/IFEX) - The Supreme Court of Mongolia has issued new interpretations of provisions of the criminal defamation law, in order to provide a uniform understanding and thus ensure the correct application of the legislation.

The interpretations apply to Articles 110 and 111 of the Mongolian Criminal Code and primarily involve legal definitions pertaining to a range of defamation terms, including "reputation", "honor", "insulting", "libelous defamation" and "damage".

Globe International is concerned that some interpretations are inadequate and could be detrimental to journalists, who have been targeted in the past in questionable defamation suits.

Globe lawyer Ganbold Davaakhuu said this risk was evident in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the term "reputation", which the court has defined as an evaluation by others and by an individual himself. Davaakhuu said a person's "reputation" should not be open to subjective evaluation.

Davaakhuu also said the revised definition of the term "libelous defamation" was similarly flawed. The court decreed that the term referred to "obviously untrue information, documents", which Davaakhuu said had not been adequately explained and still left journalists open to defamation claims.



Source:

Globe International
211238, PO Box 102
Chingeltei duureg, Khoroo No 6
Diplomat 95 Complex, Entrance No6, #70
Ulaanbaatar 15141
Mongolia
Phone: +976 11 324764, 324627
Fax: +976 11 315326
 

Stay on top of free expression news.

Sign up to receive the weekly IFEX Communiqué.


 
The International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) is a global network of 95 organisations working to defend and promote the right to free expression.
Permission is granted for material on this website to be reproduced or republished in whole or in part provided the source member and/or IFEX is cited with a link to the original item.