Sign up for weekly updates

Pakistani media owner, three others sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment for blasphemy

One of the accused, Pakistani actress Veena Malik, signs autographs for Indian school children in Chandigarh, India, 27 May 2004
One of the accused, Pakistani actress Veena Malik, signs autographs for Indian school children in Chandigarh, India, 27 May 2004

REUTERS/Ajay Verma

The anti-terrorism court in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan convicted four persons to 26 years in prison and a fine of 1.30 million rupees (approx. US$130,000) each for blasphemy.

Those convicted include Mir Shakil-ur-Rehman, owner of Geo Television network, Geo TV's morning show host Shaista Lodhi, actress Veena Malik and her husband Malik Asad. [NOTE: The case stems from a Geo TV broadcast that included a scene loosely based on the marriage of the Prophet Muhammad's daughter.]

The court also ordered the sale the property of the four 'proclaimed offenders' under Section 19(10) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, in case of disobedience.

The president of the Council of Pakistan News­paper Editors (CPNE), Mujibur Rehman Shami and the president of the All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS), Hameed Haroon termed the conviction of Mir Shakil-ur-Rehman and associated media persons as unlawful and a threat to press freedom.

In a joint statement they said that under Article 19 of the Constitution the punishment was contrary to the press freedom. They termed the Gilgit-Baltistan (empowerment and self governance) Order 2009 - under which
the judicial system has been devised for the area - against the basic concept of human rights granted to the citizens of Pakistan in the Constitution; they added that illegal sentences given to the journalists in Gilgit-Baltistan are dangerous for press freedom throughout the country.

The statement said that even though there are some basic human rights specified in the controversial order, two important human rights stipulated in the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan - according to Articles 10A and 13 - are not taken in consideration in the order.

According to Article 10A, it is the right of every citizen to be given an impartial and complete hearing in a criminal case, while under Article 13 a person cannot be tried more than one time for a single offence. The joint statement specifies that it would be a violation of these two basic human rights if a Pakistani citizen, who is not a resident of Gilgit-Baltistan or is not present there, is punished for an alleged crime by shifting the hearing of
a case there.

They also urged the Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif to take immediate notice of the situation. The Prime Minister has the power to cancel the punishment awarded by the anti-terrorism court and he
must utilise these powers, otherwise such acts would be like a 'sword of Damocles' hanging over the heads of Pakistani journalists.

What other IFEX members are saying
  • Pakistan: Repeal blasphemy law

    Pakistan's government should immediately introduce legislation to repeal the country's blasphemy law and other discriminatory legislation, Human Rights Watch said.

  • Dispatches: Reining in Pakistan's dangerous 'blasphemy' law

    In Pakistan, even an accusation of insulting Islam can be a death sentence. It is therefore good news that officials in Pakistan's southern Sindh province have taken a small step to limit the injustice of Pakistan's "blasphemy" law.

Additional resources

Latest Tweet:

2019 RSF Index: Middle East’s journalists deliberately targeted @RSF_en

Get more stories like this

Sign up for our newsletters and get the most important free expression news delivered to your inbox.