Sign up for weekly updates

Harassment of human rights activist Stanislav Dmitrievksy continues

(ARTICLE 19/IFEX) - The following is a 3 September 2007 ARTICLE 19 press release:

Russia: Harassment of Stanislav Dmitrievksy Continues

ARTICLE 19, the Global Campaign for Free Expression, is extremely concerned at the new measures taken against human rights activist Stanislav Dmitrievsky.

On 17 August 2007, the Nizhni Novgorod District Court decided to approve a motion by the Regional Department of the Implementation of Criminal Sentences to increase the sentence handed down against Stanislav Dmitrievsky in February 2006. He was then sentenced to a two years' suspended prison term for "inciting hatred and enmity on the basis of ethnicity and religion" under Article 282 of the Criminal Code. Mr Dmitrievsky's conviction was based on the publication of articles written by Chechen separatist leaders in 2004, which were non-violent and merely called for the peaceful resolution of the conflict. The new decision means that if Mr Dmitrievsky, in the course of his four-year probation, commits two administrative offences in the same year, the suspended sentence can be replaced by a two-year prison sentence.

In this case problematic recent amendments to Russia's extremism legislation were applied. The amendments expanded the definition of extremism to include "hatred or hostility towards any social group" without giving a definition of "social group" and made the offence punishable with imprisonment of up to five years.

In early July, Mr Dmitrievsky asked the Department of the Implementation of Criminal Sentences for a copy of the motion, so he could appeal it, but the Department refused to provide it. Due to late notification, Mr Dmitrievsky had only two days to prepare for the hearing.

A complaint on Mr Dmitrievsky's conviction has already been submitted to the European Court of Human Rights.

ARTICLE 19 considers Mr Dmitrievsky's February 2006 conviction to be a violation of the internationally protected right of freedom of expression. While States are permitted to take measures through criminal law against hate speech, a clear distinction should be drawn between speech that genuinely incites to discrimination, hostility or violence, and statements which are rather intended to contribute to a debate about conflicts, their causes and solutions.

International standards permit restrictions to freedom of expression on the grounds of national security only in cases in which an act is intended to incite violence and where there is a direct and immediate link between the act and the likelihood or occurrence of violence. The Russian Law "on Counteracting Extremist Activity", outlawing activities that might lead to extremist activity, fail to meet this standard.

In the Dmitrievsky case there have also been serious procedural irregularities, calling the fairness of the trial into question, as the defendant was given a mere two days to prepare for the hearing. He was also not given the opportunity to appeal the motion.

ARTICLE 19 therefore calls upon the Russian authorities to:
- reverse the decision on the motion to toughen the sentence against Mr Dmitrievsky;
- amend extremism legislation, to ensure that it restricts only statements that are intended to incite violence and where there is a direct and immediate link between the statement and the likelihood or occurrence of violence;
- take measures to create the conditions for media pluralism in Russia, including the free expression of opinions and information on the situation in Chechnya which may be critical of the authorities.

Latest Tweet:

Call for international enquiry into murders of Russian journalists in CAR; they had been making a documentary on Kr…

Get more stories like this

Sign up for our newsletters and get the most important free expression news delivered to your inbox.