Sign up for weekly updates

Concerns over appointment of chief ombudsman in Turkey

(Human Rights Watch/IFEX) - December 9, 2012 - The judge recently appointed as the chief ombudsman of Turkey's newly created ombudsman institution has a history of failing to respect human rights standards, and his appointment risks the effectiveness of the new institution.

Mehmet Nihat Ömeroglu was sworn in by Parliament as head of the ombudsman institution on December 5, 2012. The body was approved by parliament in June but has not yet been established. Ömeroglu was among the judges in the Court of Cassation, Turkey's highest court, who in 2006 upheld the conviction of the Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink for "insulting Turkishness" under the notorious article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code. Over the past week he has publicly stated to the newspaper Yeni Safak that Dink's writing "constituted a clear violation of article 301" and to the newspaper Radikal that "[we] made our decision on this case on the basis of our conscience."

"The newly appointed ombudsman continues to stand behind a court decision that the European Court of Human Rights strongly condemned as a violation of free speech," said Emma Sinclair-Webb, senior researcher for Turkey at Human Rights Watch. "If the government is serious about creating an ombudsman institution that champions citizens' rights, it should reconsider this appointment."

Ömeroglu was sworn in a week after the majority of members of parliament from the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) voted for his appointment over two other candidates.

The decision to convict Dink targeted his writing on the impact on Armenians of the mass killings in 1915. Dink was assassinated in January 2007. In 2010, the European Court of Human Rights found Turkey to have violated Dink's right to freedom of expression with the article 301 conviction, and to have failed to protect Dink's life in the face of evidence known to the authorities that Dink faced a real and imminent threat in the form of plots to kill him.

The ombudsman will be separate from the National Human Rights Institution, which the government has also made a commitment to establish. While the ombudsman can provide an important mechanism to investigate citizens' complaints against state officials and institutions, its effectiveness will depend on the person leading it and the way its powers are used, Human Rights Watch said.

Continue reading

Latest Tweet:

Unwanted Witness challenges Internet shutdowns while Francis Tumwesige Ateenyi of HRAPF challenges the "idle and di…

Get more stories like this

Sign up for our newsletters and get the most important free expression news delivered to your inbox.